![]() ![]() The test photo set is comprised of 445 files total-218 RAW+JPG plus 9 JPG only. If you don't care about the speed, you can save $14 (or ~$19 with a cheaper USB adapter) and get the Sabrent.īoth laptops have base-model dual-core Intel i5 CPUs (2.4GHz 4th gen and 2.9GHz 6th gen, respectively) and were upgraded to 16GB RAM at the time of purchase. If you upgraded from a 2012-2015 retina MBP to a new 2016 model and you want a speed boost, you'll need to buy the SanDisk. 2016 MBP with SanDisk: 3 minutes 55 seconds (87.1MB/s), 5% faster than the built-in and 19.6% faster than the Sabrent.2013 MBP built-in: 4 mins 7 seconds (82.8MB/s), 13.8% faster than the Sabrent.2016 MBP with Sabrent: 4 minutes, 42 seconds (72.8MB/s).Read speed results (from slowest to fastest): SanDisk Extreme Pro SD UHS-II Card USB-C reader ($30 on ).Best choice in 2015 according to The Wire Cutter, at least for the speed/price ratio. Sabrent SuperSpeed 2-Slot USB 3.0 reader ($7 on ) plus an Apple USB-C to USB-A dongle ($9 on ).2016 13" MacBook Pro with Touch Bar (SSD is advertised as being 2X faster).Test files: 227 photos (445 files total, RAW+JPG) totaling 21.4GBĬard: SanDisk Extreme PRO 128GB UHS-I/U3 SDXC, 95MB/s, model SDSDXPA ![]() It's faster than the old built in readers and faster than a decent USB 3 reader with dongle. ![]() I bought the SanDisk USB-C reader that's sold by Apple.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |